-
Membership Information
-
We Also Offer
-
What People Are Saying
-
Many investors waste a lot of capital fighting the dominant trends and integrating a neutral approach that focuses on dominant trends like this would help avoid that trap. It is for this reason why I’ve been utilizing Teresa Lo’s stops in my own trading more and more.
Charles Kirk (KirkReport.com)
September 19, 2008 -
For Members
-
Quick Reference
-
Read Blog by Category
-
Recommended Reading
- The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius
- The Nature of Risk
- Winning The Mental Game on Wall Street
- Reminiscences of a Stock Operator
- A Mathematician Plays The Stock Market
- How to Lie with Statistics
- Chance
- Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction
- The Winner's Curse
- New Market Wizards (Eckhardt Chapter)
- Pioneering Portfolio Management
- Unconventional Success
- A Brief History of Economic Genius
- The Age of Turbulence
- In an Uncertain World
-
My Bookmarks
- Articles by Anatole Kaletsky
- Articles by Henry Blodget @ Slate
- Articles by John Cassidy @ The New Yorker
- Articles by Larry Summers
- Articles by Michael R. Sesit
- Bloomberg on the Economy (Podcasts)
- Boston Fed: Research Center for Behvioral Economics
- Brummell Magazine
- Business Standard
- China Economic Review Daily Briefing
- Consuelo Mack/WealthTrack
- Cramer’s Mad Money Performance
- Credit Suisse eMagazine
- ECB Publications on Financial Stability
- EDHEC-Risk Asset Management Research
- F-Secure Online Virus & Malware Scanner
- GMO Research & Commentary (Requires Registration)
- Journal of Financial Planning
- MS Global Economic Forum
- NPR Business News
- Prospect Magazine
- RiskGrades for Your Portfolio
- S&P vs. Active Managers Scorecard
- Spectator Magazine
- St. Louis Fed: Finance Working Papers
- State Street Global Advisors Research & Commentary
- The Economist
- The International Economy Magazine
- Times Online
- UBS Wealth Management Magazine
- Video: Bloomberg
- Video: Financial Times
- Video: Forbes
- Video: Reuters
- Video: Search CNBC for Geoff Cutmore
- Video: Search CNBC for Guy Johnson
- Video: Search CNBC for Lakshman Achuthan
- Video: Search CNBC for Mark Tinker
- Video: Search CNBC for Peter McGuire
- Video: Search CNBC for Squawk Box Asia
Aug
19
Out of Office Notice
Teresa Lo @ 10:27 AM | | 3 Comments
Teresa is out of the office today. Trading Ideas and our Google Gadget will not be updated until after the close on Wednesday.
Questions and Comments
Members: Please log in to join the discussion if you do not see the text box below. To follow on-going comments and discussion, please point your feed reader to the COMMENT FEED.
Based on your years of experience trading, do you have a framework or approach for how to determine whether news is already cooked into the market (i.e. the market has already figured out what the news is telling us and you would expect little if any impact) as opposed to new which will move the market?
For example, at the end of the day today, CNBC reported that Goldman cut its estimates on financials. Briefing.com had a more detailed explanation.
In the context of the question, is this something we already know, something we thought we knew but this confirms it, or something new which can move the market, and does that translate into developing a trading plan around one of the financial index ETFs?
It looks like the markets answered the question in that nothing significant happened so the news was baked in. Maybe its only amusing to me, but i liked Citibank’s response to this by cutting its estimates for Goldman yesterday.
I think it goes back to some simple questions such as what is the price action going into the event? Has it been rallying into (anticipated) good news? Has it been dumping into (anticipated) bad news? From there, there are only a few scenarios possible, and we can trade accordingly.