Goldman Traders Had a Perfect Quarter
A member sent in the following WSJ report and remarked, “Nobody wins all the time, unless they cheat…”:
NEW YORK—Goldman Sachs Group Inc. traders didn’t lose any money at the end of each trading day during the first quarter, a first for the Wall Street firm, which typically loses funds on at least a handful of days in the period.
Traders raked in more than $100 million daily for 35 days and made no less than $25 million daily during the rest of the three-month period, according to a regulatory filing.
The trading results during the first quarter handily beat results from longtime rival Morgan Stanley, which said it lost as much as $30 million daily on four days during the quarter. Morgan Stanley made between $60 million and $90 million on each of 16 days during the quarter, and between $210 million and $240 million on one day.
To which I replied, “Or they netted out on the plus side. If a firm is this good and it’s public, does it not make sense to own some?”
Or, if we do some math (using an extremely conservative assumption that GS trades $1 billion/day), that’s a profit of 6.88% over a three-month period. No retail investor would pay even $1 for a newsletter claiming this sort of return, but because it’s GS, there must be a conspiracy. ;-)
Teresa Lo 4:03 PM on May 12, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Turns out three other banks did the same.
MORE: ‘Perfect Quarter; at Four U.S. Banks Shows Fed-Fueled Revival
Teresa Lo 2:17 PM on May 13, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Reuters reports Reduced competition juices banks’ trading records.
Dan 9:53 AM on May 15, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply
i can’t find the video, but jon stewart provided a good explanation that even i could understand.
the fed loans the brokers money at 0% and then they turn around and loan it back to the government in the form of bonds and collect the interest. or as steward said, the federal government is the worst loan shark in history.