Tagged: liquidity RSS

  • Teresa Lo 1:42 AM on May 16, 2010 Permalink
    Tags: conspiracy, , , liquidity   

    Flash Crash: Is Technical Analysis the Smoking Gun? 

    Sometime in the 1990s, Bill Gates achieved his goal of putting a computer on every desk. Since then, i.) academic studies have noted that the edge once attributed to indicator-based technical trading rules has practically disappeared, and ii.) it’s become obvious that most professional managers do the same thing as everyone else.

    Much has been written about the so-called Flash Crash. From the start, my thesis has been that there is no conspiracy. If anything, it was the proverbial packed nightclub that caught fire. Since Friday’s revelation of the timeline of trades executed by the investment firm Waddell & Reed, we may finally have the smoking gun:

    Gary Gensler, chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, said in congressional testimony Tuesday that regulators were focusing on one particular trader in the market for E-mini futures as part of the commission’s investigation into the flash crash.

    Gensler said the trader in question entered the market at around 2:32 p.m. ET on May 6 and finished trading by around 2:51 p.m. ET. He said this trader and others had executed hedging strategies of similar size previously.

    The Tipping Points

    What is the smoking gun, you ask? I say it was the execution of stop loss orders amassed at levels based on popular technical trading rules:

    1. Investment guru William J. O’Neil wrote “in his second book 24 Essential Lessons for Investment Success, “find it gut-wrenching and hard to admit” they were wrong when a stock loses money, but they must overcome that emotion and sell anyway – an essential move if a stock has lost between 7 and 8 per cent from your purchase price.”
    2. Popular financial blogger and portfolio manager Mebane Faber’s timing model “mechanically buys (sells) an index when it crosses above (below) its 10-month simple moving average”, according to CXO Advisory. SSRN shows that Faber’s paper has attracted 138,520 abstract views, 51,516 downloads and is number 4 in download rank of all time. His book, The Ivy Portfolio: How to Invest Like the Top Endowments and Avoid Bear Markets, features the 10-month moving average model. It’s Amazon.com Sales Rank is #19,207 in Books.
    3. Stan Weinstein’s classic, Secrets For Profiting in Bull and Bear Markets has advised using the 30-week moving average for timing for decades.
    4. Finally, there is the ubiquitous 200-day moving average that is on plotted on every chart, a line Louise Yamada once defended the use of based on “observations noted over time.”

    (More …)

     
    • Lyle 6:32 PM on May 16, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Teresa, I am surprised no one has commented. You make it sound so easy, but I KNOW it is not. I want to thank you for being the one, like in an old Hollywood movie, wearing the white hat. Or as I think of it a bit more; think of the last Hollywood Die Hard remake. You Know “The Guy,” that makes things safer for anyone listening. You can’t help everyone just those that are listening. Thank you for being too nice.

  • Teresa Lo 9:11 PM on May 14, 2010 Permalink
    Tags: , liquidity   

    “Where’s the Volume?” 

    Don’t I say every week during the real-time trading session that the ES is sometimes not liquid enough to execute more than 10 contracts without getting partial fills?

    Waddell is mystery trader in market plunge
    (Reuters) – A big mystery seller of futures contracts during the market meltdown last week was not a hedge fund or a high-frequency trader as many have suspected, but money manager Waddell & Reed Financial Inc, according to a document obtained by Reuters.

    Waddell on May 6 sold a large order of e-mini contracts during a 20-minute span in which U.S. equities markets plunged, briefly wiping out nearly $1 trillion in market capital, the internal document from Chicago Mercantile Exchange parent CME Group Inc said.

    The e-minis are one of the most liquid futures contracts in the world, providing holders exposure to the benchmark Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. The contracts can act as a directional indicator for the underlying stock index.

    Regulators and exchange officials quickly focused on Waddell’s sale of 75,000 e-mini contracts, which the document said “superficially appeared to be anomalous activity.”

    More than a week after the incident, it was still not clear what impact the unusual trading in the futures contracts had on the broader meltdown in the stock market.

    Waddell manages the $22.1 billion Ivy Asset Strategy fund, which is well-known for hedging with equity index futures when manager Mike Avery, who is also chief investment officer at the company, feels uneasy about the market.

    The Asset Strategy fund has dropped 2.76 percent this quarter, compared with a 0.80 percent decline in the S&P 500, data from Lipper Inc, a unit of Thomson Reuters Corp show.

    Gary Gensler, chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, said in congressional testimony on Tuesday that it had found one sale that was responsible for about 9 percent of the volume in e-minis during the sell-off in the U.S. markets.

    Gensler said there was no suggestion that the trader, whom he did not identify, did anything wrong in only entering orders to sell. Gensler said data showed that the trades appeared to be part of a bona fide hedging strategy.

     
    • Mike R. 9:32 PM on May 14, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      75,000 ES contracts shorted is $4.3 billion and just one hedge fund among many doing the same thing all at the same time. This brings up a question that I’ve had in the back of my mind. Can the ES futures market handle everyone and their brother shorting these contracts to hedge their portfolios all at the same time? Who is taking the other end of the trade? Is it possible that the futures market could ever meltdown or deviate from its underlying index? At what point does a hedge no longer work as a hedge???

  • Teresa Lo 4:14 AM on May 7, 2010 Permalink
    Tags: liquidity   

    That 1,000 point plunge 

    Yesterday’s burp took me back to the Crash of 1987.

    Whatever the reason for the plunge, what made it worse was probably the tripping of sell stops set below the 200-day moving averages of the major stock indexes and cost investors billions of dollars.


    NYSE Euronext CEO Duncan Niederauer went on CNBC after the close to discuss whether error really caused the market plunge today.

    How many times did he say, “Fat finger problem?”

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel
Better Tag Cloud