Tagged: question RSS

  • Dale 10:36 AM on May 24, 2010 Permalink
    Tags: , , question   

    Just a question about Gold. Dropped hard last week, and now seems almost stunned… just drifted up 1-2% from the low last Thurs-Fri. I expected a big snap back or a further drop, but not this. Any comments?

     
    • Ondrej 1:45 PM on May 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

    • Teresa Lo 6:44 PM on May 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      If almost everyone who expects something to go up already owns it, who is there to take it higher?

      GLD Daily Chart

      That failed breakout probably doesn’t help. For members, check out this podcast.

      • Dale 7:59 PM on May 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        Thanks, Ondrej, T, I guess now, we drift along happily watching the movie until someone shouts “fire” in the theater.

        • Teresa Lo 8:08 PM on May 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          I just added a link to my original reply.

          • Dale 8:32 PM on May 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

            this could be very brutal for those who have overallocated to Gold in an attempt to keep making money when the stock market is down. T, I think you mentioned the Woody Brock scenario about many people with highly correlated pricing model error. I wonder if it is compounded by leverage… yes, I’m somewhat short for a trade in my funny money account… also plan to keep holding GLD in the portfolio.

            • Teresa Lo 12:29 AM on May 25, 2010 Permalink

              Three factors: i.) correlated mistake, ii.) pricing model uncertainty and iii.) leverage. On top of that, everyone is hoping that gold price is somehow uncorrelated with equities.

      • wiinky 11:44 PM on May 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        Mish asked a similar question about U.S. home ownership :

        “Can I ask a simple question: Who does not have a house that wants one and can afford one, and does not need money from the government to buy one, and is not in danger of losing their job?”

        “Supposedly there is a recovery underway. Recovery my ass.”

      • Teresa Lo 12:38 AM on May 25, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        Also, I’m sure everyone is watching to see if gold can hold the 50-day MA.

  • Jason 8:30 AM on May 19, 2010 Permalink
    Tags: question   

    How do you know that the ES “trends” best in the afternoon between the times of 1330 and 1530?

     
  • Dan 4:45 PM on May 11, 2010 Permalink
    Tags: question   

    if a 50,000 option contract can trigger a 1000 pt plunge at the mere cost of 7.5 million, is it time for us to head to the bunkers? granted it was fueled by pessimistic investor sentiment but there’s enough uncertainty in todays world that anxiety is not a stranger.

     
  • Dan 9:06 AM on May 9, 2010 Permalink
    Tags: question   

    if the 1000 pt plunge doesn’t have a tin foil explanation (fat fingers, black helicopters, osama options), isn’t it fair to assume that we will see it again?

    as t described it, liquidity disappeared when the buy programs went away and the sellers drove the price towards zero. granted this was an extreme, but along the way a lot of safety stops were hit with indivuals losing their lunch money to those who waiting to take it.

    given the predatory nature of trading (with futures when somebody gains, someone else loses) i think its logical and almost required that there are firms out there who will exploit this weakness until regulations are put in place that would prevent it.

    is it coincidence that the plunge waited till the time slot where the circuit breakers don’t work?

    a 10% drop in the s&p e-minis is still about 100 pts which is close to 6 times the daily atr. should the breaker be at 3 times the daily atr (its fuzzy math and probably wrong if you’re a purist but i’m thinking the old bell curve with 3 standard deviations).

    what everyone else think?

     
    • Dan 9:08 AM on May 9, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      i like the column over at seeking alpha The Attack of The Machines

    • Lyle 1:11 PM on May 9, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Yes, as the market behavior reflects human behavior, we will see it again. As the computer programs and all those brilliant, I’m smarter than you guys, all their automatic stops in place. Just think of all the buys and sells just waiting to be triggered. How can it not just speed the melt up and melt downs to the extreme? As Teresa noted, all those stops below the moving average engaged. Like Captain Picard stating “engage” on Star Trek, and off the story goes. Wow, was it amazing just to sit here and watch it unfold. Of course I wasn’t playing just sitting back and being amazed. At the time I was thinking: You boys are just too smart for me, I’m taking my marbles now – recess is over….Yes, it is mostly boys not girls doing all that.

    • Teresa Lo 6:22 PM on May 9, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      I think one big problem is the fact that the market is fragmented with so many exchanges. They need some sort of consistent circuit breaker across the board.

      Everyone thought they could dance until the music stopped but when someone shouted “Fire!” in the disco, they were all crushed trying to get out the exit door. Again.

  • Dan 6:38 PM on May 7, 2010 Permalink
    Tags: question   

    so did we get some selling exhaustion today or is the only way left to go is down?

     
    • Teresa Lo 3:26 AM on May 8, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      I get the impression people are very scared and if you were a fund manager, you would now be in sell mode in anticipation of redemptions. That said, I’m sure many people already got flushed under the 200-day MA during the mini-crash, so it’s hard to tell.

      When the smoke clears from all the investigations, I bet you anything it will be because of a cascade of sell stops in the system placed just under popular technical levels. And when it got too wild, proprietary traders stopped (as has been reported) because the risk became too great.

      I don’t see why people are blaming the algos like they blamed NYSE specialists in 1987 when they failed to answer the phone. After all, the high frequency traders are not market makers.

      • Eric D. 2:11 PM on May 8, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        So, we are talking… May redemptions?, that can pull monthly, or the end of quarterly June redemptions? as well as daily mutual fund redemptions?

        Are not most the Mutual funds, automated redemptions, and computerized for the end of the day?

      • Dan 6:44 PM on May 8, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        whatever happened to Randolph and Mortimer Duke?

      • Lyle 2:15 PM on May 9, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        Yes, all of a sudden people seems scared. It’s everywhere I look now. A different mood.

        Something real that scares me. Deflation that moves in and sets up for a long-term stay in our lives. Wages are continuing to contract as far as the eye can see. The Big Picture posted a chart which originated from David Rosenberg.
        http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Rosie-CHART-1.png

        Wages down and stuff going up in price.

  • Dan 5:02 PM on May 7, 2010 Permalink
    Tags: question   

    what is the general consensus on ECB’s Trichet statement yesterday. my impression is that it was in a word, lame. tell me again why these people are worth the billions of dollars in bonuses that they get paid.

     
    • Teresa Lo 2:48 AM on May 8, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Trichet is a lifetime civil servant. As the head of the ECB, he must follow the mandate laid out in Article 105 of the Maastricht Treaty, which is to pursue price stability.

      If you recall, the ECB did a token bit of quantitative easing at the height of the crisis, and even then, only took the safest covered bonds.

      The article notes “David Marsh, author of The Euro – The Politics of the New Global Currency, said the ECB is loath to follow Anglo-Saxon banks in purchasing government bonds because this would give most help to big debtors such as Greece and Italy. “They don’t want to be seen as bail-out merchants by acting as a bond purchaser of last resort for hard-pressed nations,” he said.”

      FT reported this week, “Mr Trichet revealed that some council members had opposed a move announced on Monday to remove the minimum credit rating required on Greek government bonds used as collateral in ECB liquidity-providing operations. Whereas the ECB had backed “unanimously” the joint International Monetary Fund and eurozone rescue plan for Greece, the ECB’s own move had been agreed by an “overwhelming majority”, he said.”

      The U.S. Federal Reserve has a dual mandate (as Mishkin said, “based on the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and was most recently clarified by an amendment to the Federal Reserve Act in 1977″), and that is “to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.”

      That is why Bernanke was able to pull a MacGyver and expand the Fed’s balance sheet to $2 trillion or whatever it took to pull the economy back from the brink, a move that remains widely criticized to this day. Following this logic, what’s bad for the U.S. can’t be good for Europe either.

      The people cannot have it both ways.

    • Teresa Lo 3:45 AM on May 8, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      There is now talk of 70 billion European Stability Fund.

      They need to make that 700 billion Euros.

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel
Better Tag Cloud